🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and parents are watching closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our children's childhood". A law is expected to be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the family of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local government level due to federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.